Review: Advanced Web Ranking

Posted January 19th, 2010 in SEO, SEO tools by Tim

This is the first of a series of posts where I’ll be explaining what free and paid SEO tools I use on a regular basis.

Advanced Web Ranking is a client based application I typically use on a weekly basis to store and record search engine rankings for my own sites and client web sites.

Here’s an overview of the features:

Interface

The way rankings are presented and compared is well presented in AWR, especially compared to Raven SEO Tools SERP Tracker which only lets you compare rankings to one competitor at a time.

Advanced Web Ranking screenshot

Note: That is a standard screenshot as I didn’t want to give away what keywords and sites I track!

On demand rankings

Unlike online tools out there such as Raven SEO Tools SERP Tracker or SEOmoz PRO Rank Tracker you can run reports when you like.

This comes in handy when you are pitching to a new client and want to compare their web site rankings to competitors straight away. AWR lets you can create the profile and run it immediately.

Multiple proxy servers

Another great feature on AWR Enterprise is the ability to run multiple proxies in parallel. I subscribe and have 10 proxy servers to myself which allows me to run reports 10x faster than normal.

Look back on historic rankings

Month on month or week on week ranking comparisons aren’t always what I need to see. AWR has a great feature to compare two date ranges you’ve run rankings reports for in the past.

This is handy for when I need to compare year on year to make sure we can deliver equal or more traffic for seasonal events such as Christmas, Valentine’s Day, etc.

Tracking new competitors

When I notice new competitors achieving strong rankings gains across a few competitive keywords, I have been sure to add them to the list of domains to track in AWR.

After adding the new competitor, I was pleasantly surprised to see that AWR stores all URLs, not just those from tracked domains.

This meant that I could get historic rankings for that new competitor for as long as I’d been tracking my client’s domain!

Visibility score: Room for improvement

I’ve never really been a fan of the visibility score which AWR uses.

Firstly, you need to manually weight the search engines, because by default they are treated equally so a big change in rankings on Yahoo will have the same effect as one on Google.

Now factor in that most web sites I run get around 2% of their organic traffic from Yahoo, the visibility score it isn’t really accurately reflecting a traffic change.

Secondly, it doesn’t factor in competition on a keyword. The term “life insurance Australia” is no where near as competitive as “life insurance” yet is treated the same in terms of visibility.

I’m not sure how to best solve this, but one way could be to measure the PageRank of pages in the SERPs, i.e. the higher the aggregate PR, the more competitive the keyword.

Keyword research: Yet to try

For most of my clients I’ve been fortunate enough to be able to rely on SEM data. Search query reports along + conversion rates can’t be beat.

That being said, AWR does have its own keyword research tool which I’ve yet to try, but it’s hard to go past a quick visit to the Google Keyword Tool.

Conclusion

There are plenty of other features I haven’t explored in AWR so please feel free to comment on what features you like or dislike about AWR! Future reviews will include Raven SEO Tools, SEOmoz PRO, Majestic SEO and more!

Snagit for Mac: Screenshots for OS X

Posted January 7th, 2010 in SEM tools, SEO tools by Tim

I was pleased to have gotten an e-mail today from TechSmith announcing have finally released a Mac OS X version of Snagit!

Macbooks are so popular amongst web developers and search marketers, yet up until today I haven’t found anything like Snagit for Windows for web site audits, which I use in documents and e-mails on a daily basis.

Download Snagit Mac

301 redirects in a large site migration

Posted December 27th, 2009 in SEO tools by Tim

Today I migrated one of my sites which has around 150k pages in the Google index and thought I’d share a relatively quick and easy way to check the migration went smoothly.

Migrating to a new platform or server is always a risky time for any site that relies on organic traffic. There’s a big risk of pages going missing and redirects not working properly.

The new site featured a new design plus a different CMS platform but essentially had an identical URL structure, so ensuring existing URLs still worked was the primary goal.

I wanted to do the following on both the staging site and post-migration on the live site:

  1. Get the URLs indexed by search engines
  2. Batch testing redirections

Indexed URLs

On a database driven site with thousands of pages, it’s not always possible to get a complete list of possible URLs, so we need to prioritise the URLs that search engines are aware of.

For smaller sites (under 1,000 pages), GSiteCrawler does a reasonable job. The downsides are that it puts unnecessary load on you web server and secondly I find it crashes for larger sites.

My preferred method is to get it from a search engine index. Grabbing index data from the major engines can be a hassle. Scraping the engines is cumbersome and it’s a hassle when you get thrown a captcha.

I prefer to use Majestic SEO which provides data from a smaller search engine they run. It uses similar crawl algorithms to Google, so it’s going to be a very similar dataset, and best of all it’s free to use on your own site.

Once you’ve validated your site, go to Domain URLs > Download All and all the URLs you’ll need to redirect will be in the first column.

Note: I recommend against using the sitemap XML as it’s likely to be an incomplete picture.

Batch testing URLs

When migrating a site, the kinds of errors you don’t want to see previously working URLs giving are 404 not found, 401 unauthorized and 500 internal server errors.

I was using a sub-domain on the staging site, so once I had my list of URLs all I needed to do was search and replace “http://www.” with “http://dev.” in Excel then get a good cross section and run it through an HTTP header checker.

I put through 500 URLs at a time through my own batch HTTP header checker and fixed up any pesky 404s I found.

Post migration, I picked another set of URLs to test and again got positive results. To be 100% sure, I will be logging into Google Webmaster Tools tomorrow morning to check for 404s.

Good luck with your site migration!